Blame for NHS's £12 billion IT disaster identified

No evidence of corruption has been found in the NHS IT cock up that has cost the UK taxpayer £12.8 billion. The root causes, according to a spokesman forCampaign4Change, which campaigns for Government IT reforms, areaccountability (50%), over ambitious salesmen (30%) politically driven motives

NHS pie chart IT Context.jpgNo evidence of corruption has been found in the NHS IT cock up that has cost the UK taxpayer £12.8 billion.

The root causes, according to a spokesman for Campaign4Change, which campaigns for Government IT reforms, are accountability (50%), over ambitious salesmen (30%) politically driven motives (10%) and sheer impracticality (10%).

As the spokesman pointed out, big national IT schemes tend not to work. Many in the administration were working on their first IT project.

There's still much to be investigated, and too many missing details to list, says the Campaign4Change spokesman.

"We need a full breakdown of all the central costs, such as hotels, travelling, expenses, PR," he says.

"Then we need the costs to the NHS of the wasted work. We need details of the LSP's (local service providers) contracts themselves. We need full breakdowns of the money paid to the LSPs, which some say is excessive.

"Tony Blair was too easily lobbied by Bill Gates and other suppliers on how easy it would be to modernise the NHS using computers."

The tax payer isn't finished yet, There's billions worth of bills still to land on the doormat, warns the campaign, and yet more is due to be spent with CSC and BT.

The final costs probably about £8bn-10bn, much of which is questionable value for money.

What were the fundamental mistakes?

The programme (NPfIT) was always too ambitious. It's a bit like building a bridge from UK to US - a good idea but impractical.

But when salesmen suggested the technological equivalent of doing just that, within the NHS, Tony Blair, his officials and health ministers ushered the computer suppliers into their offices and said: "Would you like a chair?"

They had good intentions - modernising the NHS - but it's hard enough to replace one patient administration system within a single hospital, let alone replacing and integrating systems nationally.

This was last published in September 2011

MicroScope+

Content

Find more MicroScope+ content and other member only offers, here.

Read more on Sales and Customer Management

Join the conversation

1 comment

Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.

Just ever so pleased that the approach to major surgery usually involves surgeons who've had a bit of practice. Confidence would not be enhanced by "well I've never done this before so . . . . ".
This could never happen in a commercial environment because only Governments have a never ending cashcow called 'The Taxpayer".
As always, the highest paid are the least accountable, indeed they are constantly rewarded for their incompetence!
Cancel

-ADS BY GOOGLE

ComputerWeekly

SearchITChannel

Close