When I first found out that the comms sector had a representative in this year's Apprentice, I couldn't help but smile.
It's nice to have someone to get behind, and I even suggested that Stuart Baggs might want to take a pass on working for Britain's most belligerent boss and concentrate on the communications market.
By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
But after last night's display I'm starting to feel differently.
I thought Bagg's performance was a poor advert for our sector and a poor advert for the channel as a whole, and I hope customers do not judge their providers by his example.
In five years of covering channels I have found that most of you are a fairly affable bunch of people. But Baggs, on the other hand, harks back to an era of unreconstructed dinosaurs.
Throughout his stint as team leader, Baggs showed a staggering lack of judgment, at one point taking off to enjoy a day of high speed driving and boasting about having to "rein in his masculinity" while his all-female team of Joanna, Laura and Stella did the legwork.
At times he appeared to be behaving like a child, and most of the time he was domineering, arrogant, patronising and downright sexist.
It's as if he watched The Office and thought it was a training video. The industry is better than this.
Teammate Stella, who I am tipping to win outright, has clearly got the measure of him, too, ruthlessly putting him down as the winning team relaxed at a London champagne bar, where Baggs continued his rude and ungrateful behaviour.
But for the sake of £39, he avoided the chop this week, and it was the hapless Sandeesh, who earlier in the show asked in seriousness if Pinewood Studios was a furniture store, who was thrown overboard by Lord Sugar after disastrously miscalculating who to take back into the boardroom.
Given Bagg's performance last night, I'd have given Lord Sugar the £39 myself to see the back of him. Would you hire him?