<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Tony Collins&apos;s IT Projects Blog</title>
      <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/</link>
      <description>Against the Current: Exploring challenges involved in IT-based projects</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2008</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 12:14:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Council&apos;s unpaid invoices 6 months after SAP go-live</title>
         <description>Birmingham City Council - Europe&apos;s largest local authority with a £3bn annual turnover - has had an &quot;approvals day&quot; to try and clear a backlog of about 10,000 unpaid invoices from its suppliers. The invoices were &quot;struck&quot; in a SAP-based financial system, more than six months after going live.

The council said this week [May 2008] it had cleared a backlog of invoices which built up when it implemented its &quot;Voyager&quot; system in October 2007 - but its spokesman added that this led to a build-up of unpaid invoices &quot;further along in the payments system&quot;.

The council set aside 13 May 2008 as an &quot;Approvals Day&quot; to clear backlogs and &quot;identify and permanently eradicate any remaining payment issues that still exist&quot;. 

A Birmingham City Council spokesperson said today (15 May 2008): &quot;A total of 2,000 invoices were cleared as a result of Approvals Day on May 13. </description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/05/councils-unpaid-invoices-6-mon.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/05/councils-unpaid-invoices-6-mon.html</guid>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">it projects over-optimism</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">learning lessons</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">programme management</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">project management</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">sap</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">transformational government</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 12:14:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Identity and Passport Service cancels £11m web passport system</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The Identity and Passport Service [IPS] has cancelled an overly complicated replacement online passport applications system after rising costs and glitches which led to about 5,000 applications becoming stuck in the system.

The IPS told Computer Weekly that it has written of £10.9m in development costs because of the cancellation of the <a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2006/11/14/219863/passport-it-troubles-bode-ill-for-id-cards.htm">Electronic Passport Application system, known as EPA2</a>.  ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/05/identity-and-passport-service-2.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/05/identity-and-passport-service-2.html</guid>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">accountability and transparency</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">EPA2</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">good and bad communications</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">government</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Identity and Passport Service</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">IPS</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">it project success</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">learning lessons it projects</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">openness</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">project management</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">transformational government</category>
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 09:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>CSC&apos;s £3bn NPfIT contracts to be extended?</title>
         <description>The IT head of an NHS health authority has suggested that CSC&apos;s contracts under the National Programme for IT [NPfIT] - may be extended, which would extend the programme itself. 

If it happens, it could signal an intention of Whitehall officials to keep extending contracts to local service providers in the hope the NPfIT can be seen to succeed at some point. </description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/05/cscs-3bn-npfit-contracts-to-be.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/05/cscs-3bn-npfit-contracts-to-be.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">npfit</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">contract reset</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">crisis management</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">csc</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">electronic patient records</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">EPR</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">IBA Health</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">isoft</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">IT projects</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">it projects over-optimism</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">lorenzo</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">outsourcing</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">project management</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">scope creep</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">summary care record</category>
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 06:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Swindells NPfIT review - more flexibility for NHS IT buyers</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Alan Spours, Chief Information and Knowledge Officer at NHS Northwest, has told his board that a review of the National Programme for IT [NPfIT] by <a href="http://www.e-health-insider.com/news/3640/swindells_quits_dh_ahead_of_review_publication">Matthew Swindells </a>is expected to give the NHS more flexibility to implement interim solutions where products from local service providers are not available or not fit for purpose. 

He has also told his board that a contract reset with CSC, one of three main suppliers to the National Programme for IT, was due to be signed by 6 May 2008. ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/05/swindells-npfit-review-more-fl.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/05/swindells-npfit-review-more-fl.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">npfit</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">care records service</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">contract reset</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">csc</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">government it</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">isoft</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">lorenzo</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">npfit</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">programme management</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">project management</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">swindells review</category>
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 06:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>The Sun reports on potential security flaw in NPfIT Choose and Book</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Whitehall officials would like to <a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/05/is-cfh-in-a-good-position-to-o.html">control the language and information on the NHS’s National Programme for IT [NPfIT</a>], but the laws of Nature are, at times, pitched against them: The Sun has begun to take an interest in the scheme.

Following on from its article on the implementation of the <a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/04/barts-npfit-golive-ends-up-in.html">Care Records Service at Barts and the London NHS Trust</a>, The Sun has reported on a potential security breach with the “Choose and Book” system – part of the NPfIT - at a GP practice at Essex; and it has an editorial under the headline “Data Dunces”.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/05/the-sun-reports-on-potential-s-1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/05/the-sun-reports-on-potential-s-1.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">npfit</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">choose and book</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">government it</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">it security</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">npfit</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">project management</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">smartcard sharing</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">transformational government</category>
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 13:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Is NPfIT summary care record plan feasible? UCL report</title>
         <description><![CDATA[The idea of a summary care record is a good one – it could save lives. But doctors say it should be rolled out only if it’s legal and will work – and there are doubts about both.

When read carefully, the <a href="http://www.ucl.ac.uk/openlearning/documents/scrie2008.pdf">report [2MB]</a> published last week on the summary care record [SCR] early adopter sites by researchers at University College, London, raises questions about whether the scheme will work. 

It found that primary care trusts whose boards decided to become early adopters of the SCR – which is part of the National Programme for IT [NPfIT] - have had extra staff and financial help: CfH gave between £100,000 and £200,000 to each early adopter site for "set up" costs. The early adopter programme was also buoyed by strong initial enthusiasm among NHS staff. 

Yet still there have been significant problems.

So where does that leave the majority of England’s primary care trusts that won’t have the extra money and people, and perhaps won’t have the enthusiasm of the early adopters of the SCR?]]></description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/05/is-npfit-summary-care-record-p-1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/05/is-npfit-summary-care-record-p-1.html</guid>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">care records service</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">it and politics</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">it project complacency</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">not learning lessons</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">npfit</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">over-optimism</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">project management</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">scr</category>
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 11:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>NPfIT - back to choice of suppliers for NHS trusts? </title>
         <description>The NHS&apos;s National Programme for IT [NPfIT] has taken a different direction with NHS trusts being given a choice of a range of systems from various suppliers - which they were able to do before the advent of the NPfIT in 2002.</description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/05/npfit-back-to-choice-of-suppli-1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/05/npfit-back-to-choice-of-suppli-1.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">npfit</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">ascc</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">cerner</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">electronic patient records</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">framework contracts</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">isoft</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">lorenzo</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">nao</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">npfit</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">summary care record</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 11:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Is CfH in a good position to oversee the NPfIT?</title>
         <description>Comment and analysis

A study published this week into the summary care record – a pivotal part of the £12.4bn NHS’s National Programme for IT [NPfIT] – raises questions about the underlying assumptions behind the scheme, and highlights flaws in the organisation which runs it.

And Computer Weekly has learned that significant changes were made between a draft report by researchers at University College, London, and the approved final report. The final report softens or omits some of criticisms of the government and NHS Connecting for Health [CfH], which runs much of the NPfIT. Even so the final report is enlightening, comprehensive and authoritative.  </description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/05/is-cfh-in-a-good-position-to-o.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/05/is-cfh-in-a-good-position-to-o.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">npfit</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">accountability and transparency</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">government spin</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">it project over-optimism</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">it projects learning lessons</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">npfit</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">openness</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">programme management</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">summary care record</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 10:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Whitehall pushed immature technology on NHS – government-funded report</title>
         <description>Connecting for Health, which runs much of the NHS’s £12.4bn National Programme for IT [NPfIT],  is expected to be criticised in a government-funded report into &quot;early-adopters&quot; of online health records.

A year-long study, the results of which are due to be published next week, is also expected to highlight criticisms of the government by some executives at NHS Connecting for Health [CfH].  

The government wanted CfH to implement online health records quickly because of the high political profile of the scheme. This was despite the difficulties gaining support from clinicians, achieving the necessary changes within NHS organisations, and the technology being unproven.</description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/05/whitehall-pushed-immature-tech.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/05/whitehall-pushed-immature-tech.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">npfit</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">change management</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">electronic health records</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">EPR</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">it projects learning lessons</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">npfit</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">project management</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">summary care record</category>
        
         <pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 09:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Top Whitehall 200k IT jobs – hopefuls given only 2 weeks to apply</title>
         <description>Whitehall officials have allowed only two weeks for people to apply for two top IT jobs in government – each offering salaries of at least £200,000. 

The jobs were advertised on 13 April and the deadlines have passed. Some of those who were interested in the adverts say that two weeks is not enough time to prepare for applications that require comments to be made on a list of difficult questions.</description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/05/top-whitehall-200k-it-jobs-hop-1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/05/top-whitehall-200k-it-jobs-hop-1.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">npfit</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">cfh</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">cio</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">connecting for health</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">government IT</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">it project over-optimism</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">npfit</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">programme management</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2008 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Fujitsu makes revised offer on NPfIT contract</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Several people in the NHS say that health officials and Fujitsu have returned to the negotiating table after talks had stalled over a “contract reset” over the supplier’s £896m deal for installing Cerner’s Millennium systems in the south of England.

Officially nothing is being said about progress, particularly as the local elections are tomorrow [1 May 2008], but an employee at a local service provider says that a meeting was held last Thursday which involved:

-	 David Nicholson, Chief Executive of the NHS
-	 <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ian_Carruthers">Sir Ian Carruthers</a>, who is a former acting Chief Executive of the NHS, a senior responsible owner of the NPfIT and now Chief Executive of the South West Strategic Health Authority 
-	a European director of Fujitsu
-	A director from Fujitsu’s headquarters in Japan

As a result Fujitsu has made significant concessions – a revised financial offer – and the NHS would have to pay tens of millions of pounds, not hundreds of millions, to keep Fujitsu in the National Programme for IT [NPfIT]. The figures being discussed are not dissimilar to the £55m extra paid to <a href="http://www.ehiprimarycare.com/News/3396/bt_contract_reset_worth_additional_%C3%82%C2%A355m_funding">BT as part of its contract reset</a>.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/04/fujitsu-makes-revised-offer-on.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/04/fujitsu-makes-revised-offer-on.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">npfit</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">cerner</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">contract reset</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">fujitsu</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">npfit</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 11:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>World-class? - please no</title>
         <description><![CDATA[A health magazine has this week called on its readers to submit "world-class" questions. HM Revenue and Customs wants to prove it has a <a href="http://taxhack.accountancyage.com/2007/12/poynter-deliver.html">world-class data security environment</a> after the bad publicity over its apparently losing two CDs with the unencrypted details of 25 million people on them. Ministers refer to the NHS as world-class; and they want the National Programme for IT to be world-class. Gordon Brown has backed a "world-class" medical research centre in St Pancreas. 

The number 10 website says <a href="http://www.number-10.gov.uk/output/Page13664.asp">Gordon Brown wants a "world-class" standard of education</a>. In January 2008 the UK was said to be delivering "world-class e-Government"- which could mean it surpasses the quality of online public services in Papua New Guinea.  Or perhaps not.

So how measurable is world-class?

Do Eskimos have world-class <a href="http://library.thinkquest.org/3784/Questions/do.htm">igloos</a>, Canadians world-class mountains, the French world-class strikes and the Chinese world-class methods of <a href="http://www.cafebabel.com/en/article.asp?T=T&Id=14318">crowd control in Tibet?</a> Perhaps Robert Mugabe regarded his electoral system as world-class until recently.

The term is meaningless, or misleading. One could envisage a ferry company, a new airline or a rail company using the euphemism "world-class" to describe the standards of travel commensurate with the lowest fares - cattle-class in all but name. A taxi driver could drop you somewhere unexpected in return for a world-class fare. 

I'll put some egregious examples of the phrase, as used in the IT industry, on this blog. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Class">This</a> is a tolerable use of the phrase. And <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldclass/">this</a>. But the general rule is: steer clear of platitudes, jargon and clichés like the plague.]]></description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/04/worldclass-please-no-1.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/04/worldclass-please-no-1.html</guid>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">IT industry jargon and platitudes</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">npfit</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">project management</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">unclear English</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 10:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>290 patient safety incidents reported under NPfIT scheme</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Nearly 300 incidents have put patients at risk since 2005 when health officials began systematic recording of safety matters under the NHS’s National Programme for IT [NPfIT].

The incidents are evidence that new IT systems in the health service can place the safety and health of patients at risk if they, or the use of them, goes wrong - though they can also reduce risks to patients if they work well.  

NHS staff and executives have reported about 290 incidents in which there was a potential for  patients to be harmed although most major NPfIT systems have yet to be rolled out to England's hospitals. 

It has also emerged that the NPfIT was <a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/02/was-nhs-it-plan-agreed-before-downing-st-meeting-.html">launched by ministers in 2002 </a>without any formal structure for identifying incidents in which the safety of patients was put at risk by errors arising from installations of new national systems. ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/04/290-patient-safety-incidents-r.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/04/290-patient-safety-incidents-r.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">npfit</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">change management</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">it failures</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">learning lessons</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">mistakes</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">npfit</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">npfit secrecy</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NPSA</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">PACS</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">patient safety</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">project management</category>
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 12:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Some of the good and bad at HC2008 - a summing up</title>
         <description><![CDATA[Comment:

My highly subjective overview of some of the good and bad at <a href="http://www.bcs.org/server.php?show=nav.9333">HC2008</a>, the annual Healthcare Computing conference in Harrogate..]]></description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/04/some-of-the-good-and-bad-at-hc.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/04/some-of-the-good-and-bad-at-hc.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">npfit</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">change management</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">electronic health records</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">EPR</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">HC2008</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">npfit</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">project management</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 23 Apr 2008 14:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Whitehall advertises for NHS CIO </title>
         <description>The Department of Health has advertised for an NHS chief information officer. Headhunters have been recruited and interviews will take place in a couple of months. 

Matthew Swindells, acting NHS CIO, told the HC2008 annual healthcare IT conference at Harrogate: &quot;This is an absolutely crucial position, linking the policy to the strategy, to the informatics. If we can drive that from the top then other things become a lot easier for everybody.&quot;

Meanwhile the Department of Health has appointed its latest interim head of IT in the NHS, Professor Sir Bruce Keogh, NHS Medical Director. He has been appointed interim Director General for Informatics. His temporary appointment follows the resignation of Swindells who is joining consultancy Tribal.</description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/04/whitehall-advertises-for-nhs-c.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/04/whitehall-advertises-for-nhs-c.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">npfit</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">it project complacency</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">it project over-optimism</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">it projects scope creep</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">mistakes</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">not learning lessons</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">npfit</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">project management</category>
        
         <pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 16:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
