<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Tony Collins&apos;s IT Projects Blog</title>
      <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/</link>
      <description>Against the Current: Exploring challenges involved in IT-based projects</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2009</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:50:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>iSoft says Bury Lorenzo go-live takes healthcare to &quot;new level&quot; </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<br />iSoft has announced in Australia -where it's based - that its latest
version of Lorenzo, as installed at NHS Bury, "takes the efficient
provision of healthcare in England to a new level".<br /><br />The go-live
more than doubles the number of Lorenzo users in England. NHS Bury and
iSoft say that the go-live supports "almost" 600 users. <br /><br />Version RC 1.9 is the first patient administration system under the Lorenzo banner. <br /><br />Below
is iSoft's announcement - which three times mentions the supplier's
support for CSC, the NPfIT local service provider for England except
the <a href="http://www.ehiprimarycare.com/news/5355/ascc_procurements_for_the_south">south</a>. <br /><br />It's conceivable that there is a little tension
between CSC and iSoft and over iSoft's decision to sell <a href="http://www.hc2d.co.uk/content.php?contentId=12876">Lorenzo
directly to trusts in the south. </a>Elsewhere in England, Lorenzo is sold
through CSC. ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/11/isoft-says-bury-go-live-takes.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/11/isoft-says-bury-go-live-takes.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">npfit</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">outsourcing</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">CfH</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">CSC</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">e-records</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">EHR</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">EPR</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">isoft</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Lorenzo</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NPfIT</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Biggest IT industry failures?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<br />... according to <a href="http://techrepublic.com.com/5213-6257-0.html?id=4550262&amp;allowContact=false&amp;tag=leftCol;post-1126&amp;authId=fi1Jo1cAr1E/KNCJe4VlVrr+x9mcmW4wH69b732teWqskbe/piqX2t1GwZWWcYP2">Jack Wallen of TechRepublic</a>. [I don't agree with all of them - there were<a href="http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/10things/?p=1126&amp;tag=content;leftCol"> 119 comments</a> on the article at last count<br /><br />Windows Vista<br />NeXT<br />BeOS<br />Cobalt Qube<br />Y2K<br />MP3<br />Richard Stallman<br />WordPerfect<br />IPv6<br />Mesh networks<br /><br /><br /><a href="http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/10things/?p=1126&amp;tag=content;leftCol">Full article </a><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/11/biggest-it-industry-failures-s.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/11/biggest-it-industry-failures-s.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Technology</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">biggest IT industry failures</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">technology</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Vista</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Y2K</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 12:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Anatomy of an IT disaster</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<br />Below are key parts of&nbsp; today's <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmpubacc/510/510.pdf">Public Accounts Committee report</a> on
the C-Nomis report. Much the same could be said of other big IT-based
change programmes such as the NPfIT. <br /><br />Some will say plus ça change but some IT disasters are exposing near anarchy, and potentially worse, in some corners of government administration. <br /><br /><br /><b>How not to develop a project</b><i><b><br /></b></i><br /><blockquote>"We
have taken evidence on cases of poor decision taking and weak project
management on many occasions. The same lessons have still not been
learnt, making the management by the National Offender Management
Service (NOMS) of C-Nomis a prime example of how not to develop a
project."<br /></blockquote><br /><b>Beware US software which needs much rework for the UK </b><br /><br /><blockquote>"From the outset those responsible failed to identify the modifications required to the<br />software
to meet NOMS' needs. The Home Office assessed it as broadly meeting the
needs of the prison service, but as a North American product the
software needed to be adapted for UK legislation. <br /><br />"In respect
of probation, there was a serious failure to understand the magnitude
and cost of the changes which would be needed, even though the Home
Office recognised at the start that the software met only 29% of the
needs of the Probation Service.&nbsp; The estimated cost of developing the
C-NOMIS application rose from £99m in 2005 to £254m by July 2007 due to
customisation."<br /></blockquote><br /><b>Did senior civil service managers bend the truth?<br /></b><br /><blockquote>"The programme team running C-NOMIS reported that the programme was delivering on time and to budget, when it was not."<br /><br />"In May 2005, as part of the C-NOMIS project approval process, the Home Office's<br />Programme
and Project Management Support Unit certified the C-NOMIS project as
not suffering from the eight common causes of project failure.
Subsequent analysis of the underlying causes of the costs increases and
delay by the National Audit Office indicated that C-NOMIS suffered from
four of the eight common causes of project failure in full and three in
part." <br /></blockquote><b>Over-optimism and the culture of good news<br /></b><br /><blockquote>"Planning for the C-NOMIS project was unrealistic, in part because of an over<br />optimistic 'good news' culture which was not challenged with sufficient rigour by<br />senior management with in-depth knowledge of the business."<br /><br />"The
first Senior Responsible Owner and other senior people involved with
C-NOMIS demonstrated a remarkable lack of insight and rigour, coupled
with naivety and over-optimism." </blockquote>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/11/anatomy-of-an-it-disaster.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/11/anatomy-of-an-it-disaster.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">gateway reviews</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">npfit</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">outsourcing</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">politics</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">poor communications</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">project management </category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">spin</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">transparency and accountability</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">C-Nomis</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">gateway reviews</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">government mistakes</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">not learning lessons</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">over-optimism</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">prisons IT</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">project and programme management</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">senior responsible owner</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">software failures</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">SRO</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 09:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>NPfIT Lorenzo - £57,500 per user so far</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<br />The NPfIT minister Mike <a href="http://www.e-health-insider.com/news/4916/mike_o%E2%80%99brien_new_minister_for_nhs_it">O'Brien</a> revealed in a Parliamentary reply yesterday that there are 174 regular users of the Lorenzo 1 system at five NHS trusts. <br /><br />The Lorenzo system is supplied by services company CSC and software supplier iSoft under the National Programme for IT [NPfIT]. <br /><br />This number of users will increase when <a href="http://www.e-health-insider.com/news/5128/bury_is_lorenzo%E2%80%99s_november_milestone">NHS Bury</a> goes live with Lorenzo next month. But MPs are still likely to consider the number very low given the cost to taxpayers of the system. <br /><br />Taking O'Brien's figure of 174 together with £2m as a conservative figure for the cost per site of installing the Lorenzo system, the cost per user of the system is about £57,000. <br /><br />If you take the cost per concurrent user - 19 according to the minister - the cost per user rises to about £526,000. &nbsp; <br /><br />It may also be worth bearing in mind that two of the five trusts have been live with Lorenzo for more than a year. <br /><br />About £4bn in total has been spent centrally on the NPfIT and ministers have trumpeted the Care Records Service as the main aim of the programme. <br /><br />Lorenzo is one of two main NPfIT Care Records Service products to be delivered to trusts in England, the other being Cerner's Millennium. <br /><br />Lorenzo was due to have been delivered several years ago under the NPfIT. A typical NHS trust has about 1,000 to 5,000 users of its hospital administration system. <br /><br />This is <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmhansrd/cm091029/text/91029w0023.htm">O'Brien's </a>reply in full, based on a question by Conservative MP Richard Bacon, a member of the Public Accounts Committee: <br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/npfit-lorenzo-trusts-have-174.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/npfit-lorenzo-trusts-have-174.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">npfit</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">outsourcing</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">politics</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">CSC</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">isoft</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Lorenzo</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NPfIT</category>
        
         <pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Minister renews faith in Cerner and Lorenzo - but &quot;challenges remain&quot;</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<br />Junior Treasury minister Sarah McCarthy-Fry, the Exchequer Secretary, has affirmed her Government's faith in <a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/09/isoft-and-lorenzo---the-good-n.html">iSoft's Lorenzo </a>and <a href="http://www.cerner.com/public/Cerner_3.asp?id=133">the Cerner Millennium</a> software, though she added that "challenges remain".<br /><br />She was responding to <a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/richard-bacon-pqs-on-lorenzo.html">MP Richard Bacon </a>during a debate in the House of Commons on the work of the Public Accounts Committee. Bacon had expressed his concerns about the lateness of Lorenzo and the "havoc" caused by the Cerner systems at some hospitals.<br /><br /><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/minister-renews-faith-in-cerne.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/minister-renews-faith-in-cerne.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">npfit</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">outsourcing</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">BT Health</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Cerner</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">CSC</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">e-records</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">EHR</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">EPR</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Lorenzo</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NPfIT</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">outsourcing</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">project and programme management</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 11:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>NPfIT Lorenzo - is the cost per user frightening? </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<br />MP Richard Bacon, a member of the Public Accounts Committee, is, any day now, expecting answers to his Parliamentary questions on the number of Lorenzo users at five "early" adopter trusts.<br /><br />He asked for the number of users at these trusts: Five Boroughs Partnership, Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust,<a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/07/give-cerner-a-chance-says-ex-r.html"> University Hospitals of Morecambe Bay,</a> Hereford Hospitals and South Birmingham. <br /><br />The cost per user may be high, Bacon warned the House of Commons during a debate on the work of the Public Accounts Committee last week. <br /><br />Lorenzo is supplied by services company CSC in England [north of Oxford], and by iSoft directly in the south.&nbsp; <br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/richard-bacon-pqs-on-lorenzo.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/richard-bacon-pqs-on-lorenzo.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">npfit</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">outsourcing</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">politics</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">project management </category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">CSC</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">EHR</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">EPR</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">isoft</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Lorenzo</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NPfIT</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">npfit</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">project and programme management</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Labour MP: blacklist some IT suppliers</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<br />Labour MP Austin Mitchell has many times attended a meeting of the Public Accounts Committee to hear civil servants try and defend their handling of an IT-based change programme which is late, over-budget by tens or hundreds of millions of pounds, or is not meeting expectations.&nbsp; <br /><br />In summing up his views at a <a href="http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmhansrd/cm091022/debtext/91022-0013.htm">debate in the House of Common</a>s on the work of his committee, he recommended that some IT suppliers be blacklisted. <br /><br />He also spoke of the propensity of senior civil servants to buy "expensive" reports from consultants as a way of "anointing and sanctifying particular projects". This is a point made by <a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2009/06/10/236365/watmore-tells-mps-why-so-many-government-it-projects.htm">Ian Watmore, once Government CIO. </a><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/blacklist-it-suppliers-that-ov.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/blacklist-it-suppliers-that-ov.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Sir Humphey</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">outsourcing</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">politics</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">project management </category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">IT failures</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">politics and IT</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">project and programme management</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">project failures</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Sir Humphrey</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">software failures</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Reports of the NAO on risky IT projects - has a precedent been set?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<br />Since 1986 reports of the National Audit Office have been subject to a
<a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2007/10/national-audit-office-the-murk.html">"clearance process" </a>in which their factual content is agreed with
departments and agencies before publication.<br /><br />It's a good system
in theory.&nbsp; The departments "sign off" NAO reports to show that, even
if they don't agree with some NAO comments, they agree the figures and
factual statements. <br /><br />This cosy agreement stops the NAO and the
department contesting factual points at hearings of the Public Accounts
Committee, when civil servants are questioned by MPs over the contents
of NAO reports. &nbsp;<br /><br />But some departments take advantage of the
clearance process. They can refuse to agree a report until the NAO
tones down criticisms or changes its figures. <br /><br />If departments keep on refusing to sign off a report, they know the NAO will eventually give in to get its report published. <br /><br />Otherwise
delays could go on for years - which is what happened when the
Department of Health refused to clear a draft NAO report on the NHS's
National Programme for IT [NPfIT]. <br /><br />The NAO's first report on
the NPfIT was delayed by more than a year. And when it was finally
published in 2006, it was so devoid of criticism that an MP, Greg Clark, called it
<a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2008/02/national-audit-office-due-to-p-1.html">"gushing"</a>. <br /><br /><b>Defra refuses to sign off NAO report<br /><br /></b>Last week a precedent appears to have been set.
Computer Weekly has learned that the NAO published a report earlier
this month on the Rural Payments Agency's IT-based Single Payment
Scheme without any sign off by Defra, the Department for the
Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, or its agency, the Rural Payments
Agency.<br /> ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/nao-reports-on-risky-it-projec.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/nao-reports-on-risky-it-projec.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">outsourcing</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">politics</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">project failures</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">project management </category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">transparency and accountability</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Accenture</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Defra</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">government IT</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NAO</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NPfIT</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">project and programme management</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Rural Payments Agency</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Single Payments Scheme</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Government 2010 today</title>
         <description><![CDATA[On a panel I'm chairing today on making the web more inclusive are <a href="http://quadrigaconsulting.co.uk/gov2010/index.php/2009/06/30/stephen-hilton-of-bristol-city-council-to-talk-on-technology-as-enabler-of-social-inclusion/">Stephen Hilton</a> of Bristol City Council,  <a href="http://quadrigaconsulting.co.uk/gov2010/index.php/2009/09/28/john-shewell-of-brighton-hove-in-social-inclusion-panel/">John Shewell </a>of Brighton and Hove City Council and <a href="http://quadrigaconsulting.co.uk/gov2010/index.php/2009/10/21/democratic-society-founder-in-social-inclusion-panel/">Anthony Zacharzewski</a> of the Democratic Society.<br />
<br />It's at 3pm - 4.15 pm. There's a live stream of the conference (<a href="http://quadrigaconsulting.co.uk/gov2010/index.php/agenda/pre-register/">registration required</a>).<br /><br /><a href="http://quadrigaconsulting.co.uk/gov2010/">Government 2010</a> <br /><br /> ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/government-2010-today.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/government-2010-today.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Digital Britain</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Technology</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">social inclusion</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Digital Britain</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Government 2010</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">social inclusion</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 05:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>National Audit Office hits brick wall over Defra agency&apos;s IT failure</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<br />[<font style="font-size: 0.8em;">This editorial is in the hard copy of Computer Weekly this week]<br /></font><br />Hours after the National Audit Office published an <a href="http://www.nao.org.uk/publications/0809/2nd_progress_report_on_single.aspx#">unusually
critical report</a> - its third - on the IT-based Single Payment Scheme, which is run by  the Rural Payments Agency, a minister
went on BBC's "Today" programme to give the government line.<br />&nbsp;
<br />
Nothing changes. When a department gets covered with opprobrium by an
NAO report,  the relevant minister goes on BBC's Today programme with
what could be a yellowing script.<br />
<br />The routine is to disparage, in measured tones, the NAO's figures, and then say that good progress is has been made, ideally topped with a generous helping of statistics.<br />
 ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/within-hours-of-the-national.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/within-hours-of-the-national.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">outsourcing</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">project failures</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">project management </category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">spin</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">transparency and accountability</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Accenture</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">government spin</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">outsourcing</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">project failures</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Rural Payments Agency</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>£350m Rural Payments Agency IT:  pouring money into a digital landfill?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<br />Software company Erudine points out, in the wake of the report of the
NAO's report on the cumbersome and inflexible £350m systems at the
Rural Payments Agency, that government needs to change its thinking on IT.<br /><br />The
NAO report explained how the Agency is <a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2009/10/15/238141/nao-urges-defra-agency-to-replace-350m-system-thats-only-4-years.htm">reliant on Accenture contractors
</a>who cost taxpayers an average of £200,000 each. The IT system supports
the Single Payment Scheme which costs six times as much per transaction
to run as a different Scottish system. <br /><br /><a href="http://www.nao.org.uk/publications/0809/2nd_progress_report_on_single.aspx">The NAO report</a> - and many NAO reports before it - are reminders that government departments continue to rely on a small number of big contractors. Would it be better for taxpayers, auditors and the public if departments and agencies were reliant on a larger number of smaller innovators? <br /><br />Officially Whitehall executives prefer big companies because of their capabilities and skills. <br /><br />Unofficially
they place big contracts with big suppliers because of their financial
strength - suppliers need to be able to pay large sums in compensation,
or bring in extra people at short notice, when things go wrong. This is
one reason officials have, when agreeing contracts, usually obtained
financial guarantees from the US parent company of, for example, EDS.<br /> ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/pouring-money-into-a-digital-l.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/pouring-money-into-a-digital-l.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">outsourcing</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">politics</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">project failures</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">project management </category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Accenture</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">learning lessons</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">legal disputes</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Rural Payments Agency</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">software failures</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">transformational government</category>
        
         <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 06:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>The NAO&apos;s most serious criticism of any IT-based project?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[At a press conference yesterday, senior officials at the National Audit
Office made some of the most serious criticisms anyone at the NAO has made about an IT-based programme.<br /><br />Philip Gibby, a mild-mannered
Director at the NAO, said yesterday there had been "scant regard for
the proper management of public funds". <br /><br />Could a government auditor have a more serious criticism of an IT-based project or programme? Gibby yesterday could not think of one. <br /><br />He and some of his senior colleagues were talking not about the NPfIT, or the Home
Office's C-Nomis project, but a scheme to pay farmers a single subsidy,
replacing separate subsidies, called the Single Payment Scheme. <br /><br />At
one level it's simple: payments need to be made to only about 116,000 farmers.
Gibby conceded that it's small enough a scheme for payments to be
recorded on a spreadsheet. It's not as if the system needs to make payments to
millions of benefit claimants. <br /><br />But the system could <a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2009/10/15/238141/nao-urges-defra-agency-to-replace-350m-system-thats-only-4-years.htm">hardly be more complex in practice</a>, said the NAO.  ]]></description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/the-naos-most-serious-criticis.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/the-naos-most-serious-criticis.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">politics</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">project failures</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">project management </category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">spin</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">transparency and accountability</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Accenture</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NPfIT</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">over-optimism</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">project and programme management</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">RPA</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Rural Payments Agency</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">software failures</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 11:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>David Cameron questions the point of the NPfIT</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<br />From David Cameron's <a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7026435.stm">speech</a> this afternoon at the Conservative Party conference: <br /><br />"Ten years on from a government that said '24 hours to save the NHS', billions spent and yet morale is so low, some hospitals still threatened with closure, departments shutting down, productivity so poor in the NHS, what's gone wrong? Again if we don't understand why Labour are failing we won't succeed.<br /><br />"I think it's because the reform has been topped down. Targets imposed from above, endless re-organisation, nine in the last ten years, and an NHS computer costing billions of pounds that many professionals in the NHS can't really tell you what it's for, though they are worried its going to take away patient confidentiality, and I think they've demoralised the staff in the NHS and questioned their professionalism and their vocation."<a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/7026435.stm"><br /></a>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/david-cameron-questions-the-po.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/david-cameron-questions-the-po.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">Digital Britain</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">npfit</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">outsourcing</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">politics</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NHS</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NHS Connecting for Health</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NPfIT</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">npfit</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">politics and IT</category>
        
         <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>BT heckled at its own open source conference </title>
         <description><![CDATA[<br /><a href="http://foxonsoftware.blogspot.com/2009/10/bt-foss-and-national-programme.html">Interesting column on BT,&nbsp; Foss (free and open source software) and the NPfIT</a><br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/bt-heckled-at-its-own-open-sou.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/bt-heckled-at-its-own-open-sou.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">npfit</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">politics</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">project management </category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">BT Health</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">FOSS</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">NPfIT</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">project and programme management</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 14:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Change of plan on ID Cards biometrics database?</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<br />The Identity and Passport Service may <a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2009/10/06/238017/id-card-officials-back-away-from-scandal-hit-database.htm">scrap</a> plans to use the <a href="http://www.dwp.gov.uk/local-authority-staff/housing-benefit/claims-processing/hb-information-flows-programme/customer-information-system/">Customer Information System </a>as the database for ID Cards biometrics.<br /><br />The CIS is run by the Department for Work and Pensions and is the government's main citizen database. Its security has been <a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2009/08/04/237162/council-workers-sacked-for-snooping-personal-details.htm">compromised by local council staff</a> who've been snooping on data held on celebrities and acquaintances. Nine were sacked. <br />]]></description>
         <link>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/officials-change-their-minds-o.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/tony_collins/2009/10/officials-change-their-minds-o.html</guid>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">ID Cards</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category">IT and security</category>
        
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">customer information system</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">DWP</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">ID cards</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">ID Cards</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">Identity and Passport Service</category>
        
          <category domain="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag">it security</category>
        
         <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 12:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
