« Why governments are persuaded to invest in big high-risk projects - one theory. | Main | Another important comment from a reader on the blog entry: why governments are persuaded to invest in big high-risk projects - one theory »

Excellent reader comment on blog entry: why governments are persuaded to invest in big high-risk projects - one theory.

David, a reader, makes this strong point on the blog entry: why governments are persuaded to invest in big high-risk projects - one theory.

"There is one other major difference between private projects and government projects. When a company screws up, it risks losing business. When a government screws up, citizens don't have a choice to go elsewhere (or at least, most don't). It's not like farmers can say to the rural payments agency "We're taking our business elsewhere".

"Voting is the closest thing to customer feedback, but effective management of IT projects is not on the average voter's agenda. Perhaps that's because they believe that government IT projects inevitably fail, or because they don't see how vital IT is to positive and effective change within the public sector."

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.computerweekly.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-tb.cgi/5753

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on April 10, 2007 4:52 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Why governments are persuaded to invest in big high-risk projects - one theory. .

The next post in this blog is Another important comment from a reader on the blog entry: why governments are persuaded to invest in big high-risk projects - one theory.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.