As a technology
journalist, I have spent many years being the personal helpdesk of friends and
family who are having issues with their IT. From the emails asking, "why won't my
phone switch on?" to the phone calls asking "why won't my PC switch on?" I may
not always have the answer, but I do my best to help them or at least point
them in the right direction.
As networking editor
at Computer Weekly, these questions have become even more focused to the likes
of "is it worth changing mobile operators to get 4G?" to "is superfast
broadband worth the extra cost?"
The more philosophical
questions I can handle, or at least offer a lot of evidence around them for a
friend to make an education choice. But, I am embarrassed to say, today I have
been unable to convince myself of my own advice.
I have just moved
house and as a result have the opportunity to get a new broadband provider.
Brilliant, I thought, I live in North London so have some great speeds to choose
from and a hell of a lot of ISPs serving my area!
I opted for price
comparison sites to see what was available in my post code but, for starters,
the lists of providers and deals seemed endless and hard to distinguish between.
Then, when I clicked through to one of the deals, the attractive figures disappeared
and the price quadrupled.
I called a few up that
I know from my writings have good reputations, but the customer service was
very poor and left me unwilling to commit.
I finally settled on
one deal I thought was reasonable and I was ready to go ahead. I was then told
the company in question wasn't able to check whether the phone line I had was
compatible or not until the order had gone through, meaning I had to sign up
for a year contract and either wait up to six days for the line to be activated
or wait until the start of December for an engineer to come round.
Unsurprisingly, I
decided against this one as well.
So, now I am in a quandary.
Do I go with one of the big guns where I know I can get impressive speeds - if I
pay through the nose for them - but the hateful experience of faceless
corporate customer service or go through the complicated and arduous process of
going with a smaller ISP that could take months to get set up but know if
things go wrong, it will get fixed quicker?
And even if I pick one
of these two options, which massive firm or little ISP do I plump for?
People like me shouldn't
complain. I live in a city where there is choice, competition and the ability
to get great speeds. Many places across the UK don't have such joy.
But my complaint is
true for all of us, whichever corner of Great Britain you sit. Why do ISPs make
it so complex to figure out what the genuine price and genuine speed of their
services are?
More than half price
for six months and five days, with monthly changing line rental until we say
different and the bonus of a free pony if you pay for the stable after the
first year? Ok, I made the last bit up, but I have had £40 Marks and Sparks vouchers
waved in front of my face.
I would like to know
how much it will cost me to get a connection of roughly 10Mpbs per month,
including everything I need to make it work, without trying to trick me with
extras, and how quickly I can get it installed. Too much to ask?
Well, even if you are
the networking editor of this title, it appears so.



Leave a comment