Two back to back
events recently saw Quocirca talking to veterans of the software industry; CA
and Symantec. The high level message from both is pretty much to same; we
help to secure and manage your data and IT infrastructure. Yet, it is rare
to find these two head-to-head; because in reality they are more different than
they are alike.
True, they are both US
headquartered (more or less) pure software companies with annual revenues of a
similar order (CA circa $5B, Symantec circa $7B) and both with profits of
around $1B. Their current share price and market-cap are similar and their
stock market history has followed similar ups and down over the last decade.
Both are now 30-something; CA founded in 1976 and Symantec in 1982. Symantec's
higher revenue is reflected in its head count, 20K employees opposed to CA's
14K, but that gives them remarkably similar productivity of about $350K per
head.
Furthermore, both sit
on similar piles of cash of about $13B. This ability to accumulate cash has
been key to the way each has grown, through aggressive acquisition; both have
acquired tens of companies over the years, in Symantec's case almost doubling its
size when it merged with Veritas in 2004 to move into the storage market.
So, for two companies
appearing so similar what are the differences that allow them to operate side
by side in the IT industry without too many dogfights? The most obvious is their
legacy; CA comes from a background of providing software for mainframes (the
ultimate in enterprise computing), whilst Symantec's origin lies in its
consumer focussed Norton anti-virus technology (probably still a more
recognised brand than Symantec itself). The main target market shared by both
vendors is supplying software for mid-market and enterprise businesses to
manage and secure Windows and Linux based systems.
Even here, whilst they
may still sound similar their products have historically not overlapped much.
When it comes to management Symantec's main focus is end-points (via its 2007
Altiris acquisition) and storage, whilst CA is listed as one of the big 4
systems management companies (along with BMC, IBM and HP - or 5 if you include
Microsoft), focussed on broad management of enterprise IT (in CA's case
including those mainframes).
In security,
historically the overlap has also been limited. Many still think of Symantec as
primarily a security company, but over the years its acquisitions have taken it
beyond its roots in anti-virus to included email security, web security, data
loss prevention (DLP) and so on. Few think of CA in the first instance as a
security company but it also always operated in this space, more focussed on
identity and access management (IAM), despite also having its own anti-virus.
However, that is
changing - CA has been acquiring more and more security assets, for example it
moved in to DLP in 2009 when it acquired Orchestria. And Symantec is now moving
into IAM with its O3 platform that includes single sign on (SSO) via a
partnership with Symplified, secure web access and compliance
enforcement/reporting. Whilst Symantec remains by far the bigger of the two in
IT security, it can expect to see more and more of CA going forwards.
Both vendors are keen
to be seen as innovators (or keeping up depending on your viewpoint) with the
key IT trends; cloud, mobile, social media, big data etc. However, this week
they were both as keen to talk about people as products and solutions. Symantec
has recently replaced its CEO of the last 3 years, Enrico Salem (whose blood
was said to flow yellow, the vendor's corporate colour) with Steve Bennett who
joined the board from Intuit in 2010. In a session on strategy, Symantec had
little to say except the new CEO's pronouncements could be expected in January
2013. John Brigden, Symantec's head of Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA)
for the last 7 years will be keen to see what that means for his organisation.
CA has already shaken
up its EMEA operations bringing a new head Marco Comastri just over a year ago
from Poste Italiane (he has also worked at IBM and Microsoft). Comastri is
bringing new faces and trying to get CA EMEA more focussed on solution selling
than technology.
Whether it is at the global or European level, these two software juggernauts have a momentum all of their own and management may find is frustrating to change direction. They should not try too hard, both have huge legacy customer bases and healthy finances, shareholders will not be happy to see either compromised.


Leave a comment