How will the business consultancies cope as public sector gold mine closes?

| 1 Comment
| More

The government spending review and the cost cutting that follows will leave its mark on the business consultancy industry.

I have blogged at length about how the IT suppliers are reacting to the government's demands to cut costs. But what about the big consultancies?

Gone are the days of up to 100 consultants being embedded within a public sector organisation, a senior executive at one of the biggest consultancies told me.

He admitted the public sector has been a big for consultancies with hundreds of consultants charging the government day rates overseeing massive projects. But this cannot go on and small groups will replace the large groups and charging will be based on the benefit the customer gets.

The government will actually need consultants more than ever if it is to meet its cost cutting targets while retaining service levels. This is because there needs to be a reengineering of processes. This will include, for example, the introduction of shared services and could mean some offshoring. The government does not have the in-house resources required to push this type of programme through.

The current clampdown on consultancies being used within government might have to be lifted. Currently any expenditure over £20,000 needs ministerial sign off. This limits a lot of consultancy work.

"There was a lot wasted effort in the past but consultants will be needed to make the changes required," said the executive.

I wrote a blog post in July after a meeting with an IT consultant who said the government is currently benefiting from free consultancy because many suppliers do not want to lose momentum on projects.

1 Comment

On the subject of the public sector goldmine; the old adage, those that can do, those that can’t consult, and consult for huge sums of public sector money, is clearly an accusation not without some merit in the public sector, where in many cases the consulting itself was the project; the outcome was the consulting.

I think this viewpoint of practical, outcome measured consultants, being vital to delivering the savings necessary in public sector hits the problem and potential of consulting nail directly on the head. Moreover, it should inform the government not to throw the good consulting baby’s out with the spending limit bathwater.

Outcome driven consultants, those not simply living off the proceeds of a consulting project, but who drive and direct positive public sector outcomes are out there, and they are adding value to government projects.

Building the next generation of shared services such as PSNs will need expert consultants and facilitators; they will have to bring a diverse range of stakeholders together to achieve success; the public service organisations, the IT suppliers, government security agencies, politicians.

These stakeholders will have to work collaboratively, and the consultants that deliver successful (on time, on budget, demonstrable benefits) outcomes will wear the project success as their badge of honour, and not the number of billable days they achieve for the business.

Perhaps the government should look across the UK public sector where consultants have been instrumental in the inception, procurement, and successful outcomes of a project and leverage this as best practice methodology; with the wider public sector outcome as the project sign off not the delivery of a consulting report.

Leave a comment

Have you entered our awards yet?

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Karl Flinders published on October 19, 2010 12:22 PM.

Why does the Ministry of Defence have over 6000 IT procurement staff and its own version of Microsoft Windows? was the previous entry in this blog.

Government CIO invites Indian IT suppliers to bid for contracts and inadvertently reveals disharmany is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

 

-- Advertisement --