Why is Barclays cutting IT suppliers and moving work in-house?

| No Comments
| More
Barclays' decision to end supplier contracts and take two IT functions in-house is an interesting one. Why has Barclays taken this route?

Last month Barclays decided to end a desktop management contract with Getronics and take it back in-house. The bank then decided not to renew a six year contract with Accenture. The contract included application development and support for UK banking systems.

One CIO told me that banks are always looking at the numbers and if outsourcing contracts get more expensive over time they may in fact be cheaper to in-source.

While this is true for many contracts it could not have been the case for the Getronics contact. A source of mine tells me there is no way Barclays would get a cheaper deal. Getronics was apparently 15.8% cheaper than its predecessor on the contract which was EDS.

Another contact said the financial trouble that Getronics found itself in 2007 before it was taken over by KPN could be one of the reasons for the Barclays decision. He questioned: "Is this the fiurst of many of the Getronics clients that change suppliers?"

Leave a comment

Have you entered our awards yet?

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Karl Flinders published on January 11, 2010 1:01 PM.

Has the erosion of Indian service provider dominance begun? was the previous entry in this blog.

Infosys results show recession has gone a full circle is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.


-- Advertisement --