The owner of the site felt I had been overly critical of Lotus, however in my defence I have always had a jaundiced eye towards the way the IBM runs the brand but my recent employment by Microsoft has, I suspect tipped the balance.
It was a bit sad not being given any 'notice to quit', but it was their game and they simply took the ball away, c'est la vie
Like everything else it started me considering some of the consequences of these type of communities. These sort of public open, heavily aligned sites (similar lists have been on Usenet for years) are great to feel the pulse of the central topic, connect with like minded souls and generally get information, but without critical input they can become self-delusional if only politically acceptable views are acceptable, I would argue there has to be room for the 'not we's'..
I suspect there is the equivalent of planetgroupwise somewhere on the net and I would guess according to them everything in the garden is rosy and the world is there oyster.
It sort of reminds me of Zaphod Beelbebox's peril sensitive sunglasses.
Comments (4)
Sorry to hear that but I've subscribed anyway and for what it's worth I worry about the self congratulatory tone of >80% of the PlanetLotus aggregate. That's assuming the post has any relevance to Notes - there is a lot of personal stuff on there as well. I even quite like reading that. However you are right, you need constructive criticism to keep being sharp and improving. Don't get me wrong I thing Notes / Domino is a fantastic product, especially 8.5 (I've been using it since 4.5) but that doesn't mean that there aren't things that need improving.
I look at my Feed reader more often than PlanetLotus anyway. Maybe Duffbert will let you play with him.
Posted by Auldbreck | February 20, 2009 11:49 AM
Posted on February 20, 2009 11:49
Ian,
I would like to comment on this. May I first have your permission to post the email you sent me on 10/7/2008 in regards to this very matter?
Yancy
planetlotus.org
Posted by Yancy Lent | February 20, 2009 5:41 PM
Posted on February 20, 2009 17:41
I had the date wrong, the email you sent 10/6/2008 6:16 PM EST.
Posted by Yancy Lent | February 20, 2009 5:42 PM
Posted on February 20, 2009 17:42
Actually Yancy, the mere fact you published that I sent you an email is a breach of confidence. However as I am away from my home PC at the moment I will respond directly to your request on my return home on Sunday.
Posted by Ian White
|
February 20, 2009 8:19 PM
Posted on February 20, 2009 20:19