<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Inspect-a-Gadget</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:www.computerweekly.com,2009-01-19:/blogs/inspect-a-gadget//208</id>
    <updated>2009-11-20T11:11:09Z</updated>
    <subtitle>Latest news on gadgets and hi-tech toys for business</subtitle>
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Enterprise 4.32-en</generator>

<entry>
    <title>ChromeOS: The Operating System for Gadgets?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/2009/11/chromeos-the-operating-system-for-gadgets.html" />
    <id>tag:www.computerweekly.com,2009:/blogs/inspect-a-gadget//208.78633</id>

    <published>2009-11-20T10:02:41Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-20T11:11:09Z</updated>

    <summary>Yesterday evening (yesterday afternoon in the USA) Google formally demonstrated Google Chrome OS to a throng of salivating journalists. It&apos;s been known about for a while, but this was the first time anyone was able to look at it working....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Karl Hodge</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Google" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/">
        <![CDATA[<p><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: arial, sans-serif; border-collapse: collapse; white-space: pre-wrap; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; "></span></p><div><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; ">Yesterday evening (yesterday afternoon in the USA) Google formally </font></font><a href="http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2009/11/releasing-chromium-os-open-source.html"><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; ">demonstrated Google Chrome OS to a throng of salivating journalists</font></font></a><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; ">.  It's been known about for a while, but this was the first time anyone was able to look at it working. Those cynical scribes, almost to a man and woman, hit Twitter and the blogs soon after with a general response that can be largely summed up as "so what?"... Of course, there were positive voices here and there but, on the whole, it feels like most commentators were competing to be the little boy who saw the Emperor naked.</font></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; "><br /></font></font></div><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; ">
Chrome OS isn't an operating system in the traditional, desktop computing sense.  It's designed to boot up from solid state hardware in about 7 of your Earth seconds, and be ready to use.  Instead of applications on your local drive, the apps are online. They're Google apps like Docs and GMail, services like Facebook and Twitter.  Although the OS has already been <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5WlSZDTcFt4">found out in the wild</a>, you won't be able to buy Chrome OS in a box.  You'll have to buy a device with the OS already embedded.&nbsp;</font></font><div><div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); border-collapse: collapse; white-space: pre-wrap; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; ">
My take is this: Chrome OS is for a growing audience of </font></font><i><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; ">service users</font></font></i><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; "> - people using the web, Facebook, emailing each other... It's for that generation of folks who have grown up with computers and mobile devices to whom SMS and Bebo are second nature, but who wouldn't know a spreadsheet even if their name appeared in one on Wikileaks. It's not necessarily for business users or digital specialists - though they can be online service users too.</font></font></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); border-collapse: collapse; white-space: pre-wrap; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; ">
</font></font><p><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; ">The criticism I'm seeing splits into two camps. The first is should the Windows/Apple hegemony be quaking?  It's a moot question - because until cloud computing is powerful enough to replace Exchange, Office and the MS monopoly in business, there will be a need for traditional laptops running Windows.  Specialist apps will need a local OS for the time-being.  Graphic designers will still want Photoshop on their Mac Pros. Gamers will still want machines you can max out with RAM and fit with the latest graphics card.&nbsp;</font></font></p></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); border-collapse: collapse; white-space: pre-wrap; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; ">What Google seem to be asking though, is why do you need all that just for getting your emails?</font></font></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); border-collapse: collapse; white-space: pre-wrap; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; ">
</font></font><p><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; ">The second lot of criticism seems to be - "HAHA it's not an operating system at all! I am clever and techy and it's just Linux on a ROM chip!".  This says more about journalistic expectation than the apparent intention of Chrome OS. People expected an OS that fit their existing view of Windows, OS X and the *NIX family. Google's offering is something different.  It's "just a browser".  That's kind of the point.</font></font></p><p><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; ">Could it fail?  Yes, it most certainly could. There's a history of thin client devices coming to market and being given a jolly good ignoring by the general public and business.  Oracle and Sun invested heavily in them during the 90s for example, with very little take up.</font></font></p></span></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: rgb(0, 0, 0); border-collapse: collapse; white-space: pre-wrap; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; ">But, here's why I think the concept </font></font><i><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; ">could</font></font></i><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; "> work now in the consumer market.  Next year is shaping up to be all about tablet PCs and netbooks: portable, lightweight computing devices that straddle the niche between smartphone and laptop.  See where I'm going?  Chrome OS will be debuting on a device, will be coming into a market and competing with similar products from Microsoft (the "</font></font><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UmIgNfp-MdI"><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; ">Courier</font></font></a><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; ">" project) and Apple (the mooted "</font></font><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mOSkyYNLkuw#t=08m29s"><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; ">Slate</font></font></a><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; ">") - as well as in all probability ASUS, Dell and a bunch of others.  So - this won't be a "wilderness" product; something no one understands. And, it'll be cheap, be branded with a name everyone knows and it'll be fast.</font></font></span></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; white-space: pre-wrap; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; "><br /></font></font></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; white-space: pre-wrap; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; ">Could the public's willingness to accept Linux on netbooks be an indicator that they'll be happy to work with Chrome OS on a netbook or tablet?  We don't have a crystal ball - just balls of steel.  And we're willing to wait and see rather than condemn Chrome OS before the products have even come to market.  In the meantime, </font></font><a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/googlechrome#p/a/u/1/0QRO3gKj3qw"><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; ">you can find out what all the fuss is about on YouTube</font></font></a><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; ">.</font></font></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; white-space: pre-wrap; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; "><br /></font></font></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000" face="arial, sans-serif"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; white-space: pre-wrap; -webkit-border-horizontal-spacing: 2px; -webkit-border-vertical-spacing: 2px;"><br /></span></font></div></div><p></p>
</div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Mini MIDI: Korg&apos;s Nano Controller range</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/2009/11/mini-midi-korgs-nano-controller-range.html" />
    <id>tag:www.computerweekly.com,2009:/blogs/inspect-a-gadget//208.78599</id>

    <published>2009-11-20T08:14:29Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-20T09:39:35Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[I am that ubiquitous thing: a tech journalist with a secret past as a part-time musician.&nbsp; I know it doesn't sound like a natural match but - believe me - we are legion.&nbsp; It's always nice when my twin obsessions...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Karl Hodge</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Audio" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Music" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/">
        <![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">I am that ubiquitous thing: a tech journalist with a secret
past as a part-time musician.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>I know it doesn't sound like a natural match but - believe me - we are legion.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>It's always nice when my twin obsessions
(gadgets and noise) come together.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>I've
just been checking out <a href="http://www.korg.co.uk/products/software_controllers/nano/sc_nano.asp">Korg's NanoSERIES</a> range of USB MIDI-controllers.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>These things are very cool. And very weird.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">To explain.... <st1:place w:st="on">MIDI</st1:place> is the
protocol for translating musical notes into bit and bytes.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>That includes routines for volume, tone, key
pressure and so on. Budget MIDI-controllers are rarely very exciting - little plastic
keyboards or USB mixers with lots of knobs.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp;
</span>Boring. Functional.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">Then along comes the Korg Nano range.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Taking a more designery (I'm assured by
Google that this is now a word) approach to gadget fashioning, they're three neat
looking, strange little USB units with different MIDI control functions. The nanoKEY is a slick mini-keyboard, with chunky keys for porky fingers like mine.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Smaller than a laptop QWERTY, it'll easily
fit on your desk, we suspect. Then there's the nanoKONTROL - a similar board
with lots of knobs. If you've ever tried using a music recording program you'll
know there are an interminable number of volume, balance, equaliser, level,
send, effects and (fill in the blank here) controls.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>With this, you can assign software controls
to nine real live twisty knobs and sliders and eighteen switches. Not enough
control for you?<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Add another one. Or a third.
Brilliant.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>A just released new plug-in
for Apple's GarageBand makes it even more useful.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">That just leaves our favourite: the NanoPAD.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>It's a similarly sized deck with a dozen
sensitive pads that you can tap, smack or hit with a drumstick. Instant
drumkit, just add a laptop. And some software.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">All the Nano range are under £50 - with the nanoKEY available for £39.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>When mine
arrives, I'll give you a more in-depth overview.&nbsp;</p><p class="MsoNormal">Here's Korg's offical video, Check out the chap rocking out at the bus stop...</p><p class="MsoNormal"><br /></p><p></p> 

<p style="text-align:center;"><object width="480" height="295"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/WggIkVbscxY&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/WggIkVbscxY&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="295"></object></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Kindle for PC, Available Now</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/2009/11/kindle-for-pc-available-now.html" />
    <id>tag:www.computerweekly.com,2009:/blogs/inspect-a-gadget//208.78126</id>

    <published>2009-11-19T09:41:51Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-19T09:51:12Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Kindle for PC - Amazon's Windows based electronic book reading software - is now available for free download. Yay.&nbsp; Amazon have only sent me 4 emails reminding me of the fact so far.&nbsp; Even though I grabbed it last week....]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Karl Hodge</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Amazon" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/">
        <![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">Kindle for PC - Amazon's Windows based electronic book reading software - is <a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/feature.html/ref=pe_15240_13665050_fe_img_1/?ie=UTF8&amp;docId=1000426311">now available for free download</a>. Yay.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Amazon have only sent me 4 emails reminding
me of the fact so far.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Even though I
grabbed it last week.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">First impressions? I'm sure this beta version will make a lot more sense if
you actually have a Kindle.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>The
standalone functionality enables you to download and install electronic books
wrapped in Kindle DRM, and share them with your device.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Which is super. &nbsp;You can bookmark pages, synchronise your reading progress between devices and quickly navigate through your download library.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">If you don't actually have one of Amazon's coveted
e-readers, you can still use the software to buy new books - though not
all titles are available in the <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">UK</st1:place></st1:country-region>. Still, 300,000 books is a pretty good selection. Disappointingly, the overall functionality of the PC software isn't as good as some existing free
solutions.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Adobe Reader comes to
mind.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Try dragging a PDF to Kindle for
PC and it'll just look at you funny.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">You also miss out on the unique selling points of an
e-reading device; electronic ink, portability and so on.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>We could, at a pinch, see ourselves
installing this on a netbook - and that would save us the price of a real
Kindle; currently about £155.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Give it a few months though,
when 2010's inevitable tablet PC war begins. Then Kindle for PC will be worth another look.&nbsp;</p> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Orange Users Can Now Tweet by SMS</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/2009/11/orange-users-can-now-tweet-by-sms.html" />
    <id>tag:www.computerweekly.com,2009:/blogs/inspect-a-gadget//208.77449</id>

    <published>2009-11-17T10:15:28Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-17T10:28:10Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Orange are the latest UK mobile operator to strike a deal with Twitter, following the lead of Vodafone and O2. &nbsp;You can now receive updates from the service by SMS - and send Tweets by text message too - if...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Karl Hodge</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Mobile" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Twitter" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/">
        <![CDATA[<div>Orange are the latest UK mobile operator to strike a deal with <a href="http://blog.twitter.com/">Twitter</a>, following the lead of Vodafone and O2. &nbsp;You can now receive updates from the service by SMS - and send Tweets by text message too - if you use the provider. Not only that but they've enabled picture messaging too, which is apparently a bit of a first. &nbsp;So, hurrah for that.</div><div><br /></div><div>Fun fact: Twitter was first conceived as an SMS messaging service, not the online, real-time, instant messenger that it's become. In Europe, at least, this ambition was thwarted by the fact that our mobile operators charge for SMS transit - so Twitter were unable to extend the free service they launched in the USA to our shores. Put that in your next pub quiz.</div><div><br /></div><div>Alas, I wasn't alerted to the Orange deal by a press release or even the message that now greets Twitter users when they log directly into the site. &nbsp;No - I was woken up this morning at 2 AM by a text message from <a href="http://twitter.com/goodbyebuddy">@goodbyebuddy</a>, the Twitter service that tells you when someone's unfollowed you. So, thanks for that <a href="http://twitter.com/mediaasia">@MediaAsia</a>. No longer will you be able to enjoy my often sweary&nbsp;<a href="http://twitter.com/karlhodge/status/5691649889">micro-thoughts on obscure 80s goth bands</a> or my <a href="http://twitter.com/karlhodge/status/5776759768">pithy mini-reviews of cancelled American TV shows</a>. &nbsp;I'm sorry I didn't follow you back, but I wasn't all that interested in the new Chupa Chups marketing campaign or which TV channel has secured Premier League football rights. In Hong Kong.</div><div><br /></div><div>By the way, if you're an Orange, Vodafone or O2 user you can change your SMS settings on Twitter by going to the site and choosing <a href="http://twitter.com/devices">Settings &gt; Mobile</a>.&nbsp;</div> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Video: Sony Ericsson Rachael: Android + Heart = Smartphone</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/2009/11/video-sony-ericsson-rachael-android-heart-smartphone.html" />
    <id>tag:www.computerweekly.com,2009:/blogs/inspect-a-gadget//208.77053</id>

    <published>2009-11-17T08:42:50Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-16T16:54:14Z</updated>

    <summary>Sony Ericsson have taken a real beating of late, and despite the Satio looking like a powerful piece of kit, it&apos;s just not very clever. They seem to have made a note of this and ditched Symbian for Android. The video below will add a wow factor I can&apos;t put in words.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Faisal Alani</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Sony" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Video" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="sony" label="sony" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/">
        <![CDATA[Sony Ericsson have taken a real beating of late, and despite the Satio looking like a powerful piece of kit, it's just not very clever. They seem to have made a note of this and ditched Symbian for Android. The video below will add a wow factor I can't put in words.<br /><br /><div align="center"><object height="385" width="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/YDCDUKGaYwI&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/YDCDUKGaYwI&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="385" width="480"><a style="left: 481px ! important; top: 59px ! important;" title="Block this object with Adblock Plus" class="zxjgxtnzibmdahrvmzlf cuxcyajciblqtvzrtdcs" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/YDCDUKGaYwI&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;"></a><a style="left: 471.5px ! important; top: 0px ! important;" title="Block this object with Adblock Plus" class="zxjgxtnzibmdahrvmzlf" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/YDCDUKGaYwI&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;"></a></object><br /></div><br />As long as the hardware matches the slick software then I can't see this going wrong. As with all Sony Ericsson's it will have a killer camera so I think I'm sold... as long as it doesn't look ugly. I once dated a Rachael and if this phone looks anything like her then I hope it comes with a massive stylus ;)<br /><br />]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Video: Sony unveils 3D-360 degree display - Great for looking at</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/2009/11/video-sony-unveils-3d-360-degree-display---great-for-looking-at.html" />
    <id>tag:www.computerweekly.com,2009:/blogs/inspect-a-gadget//208.77043</id>

    <published>2009-11-16T16:26:40Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-16T16:40:53Z</updated>

    <summary>Sony is at the forefront of 3D tech and this prototype is an example of their ambition.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Faisal Alani</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Sony" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Video" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="3d" label="3d" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="sony" label="sony" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/">
        <![CDATA[Sony is at the forefront of 3D tech and this prototype is an example of their ambition.<br /><br />3D has been restricted to flat screens but we all know that 3D should be something you can walk around etc. a bit like real life but without the touching.<br /><br />If you ask me it looks like a soft toy trapped in time. Don't get me wrong, I like it but just look at his little face.<br /><br /><br /><div align="center"><object height="295" width="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/lAS55_RngoQ&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/lAS55_RngoQ&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="295" width="480"><a style="left: 489.5px ! important; top: 139px ! important;" title="Block this object with Adblock Plus" class="zxjgxtnzibmdahrvmzlf cuxcyajciblqtvzrtdcs" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/lAS55_RngoQ&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;"></a></object><br /></div><br /><br />It's got 24-bit colour imagery and you can look at it from any angle without those cool glasses.Sony sees this as being something that can be used as a TV, in digital signage, 3D photo frame or something to help you shop online with.<br />]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Review: Google Maps Navigation</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/2009/11/google-maps-navigation.html" />
    <id>tag:www.computerweekly.com,2009:/blogs/inspect-a-gadget//208.76942</id>

    <published>2009-11-16T11:38:12Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-18T14:27:26Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[There's been a bit of kerfuffle on the Internetworks about Google Maps Navigation lately. &nbsp;Here are the Cliff's Notes: &nbsp;A recent, Android-only update to Google Maps added turn by turn navigation to the app. &nbsp;That means that anyone with a...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Karl Hodge</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Google" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Mobile" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/">
        <![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"></p><p class="MsoNormal"></p><p class="MsoNormal">There's been a bit of kerfuffle on the Internetworks about <a href="http://bit.ly/1aV6rd">Google Maps Navigation</a> lately. &nbsp;Here are the Cliff's Notes: &nbsp;A recent, Android-only update to Google Maps added turn by turn navigation to the app. &nbsp;That means that anyone with a supported mobile phone, unlimited data and a built in GPS can now use Google Maps Navigation as a route planner and in-car navigation tool. &nbsp;For nowt.</p><p class="MsoNormal">Unfortunately,&nbsp;Google Maps Navigation has only launched in the USA so far - and only on Android 2.0 devices.</p><p class="MsoNormal">But in all the Twittering and gnashing of keys, no one seems to have noticed that the current incarnation of Maps on Android - available here in the UK - is pretty handy right now. &nbsp;You can already do route planning, turn by turn navigation and 3G location.</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">I've been trialling an HTC Hero on Orange (full deposition coming later this week) and used the opportunity to give the current navigation features a go. &nbsp;My verdict? They're very handy - great for stomping around an unfamiliar city or taking a country walk - but the likes of Tom Tom and Navman don't have to worry too much. &nbsp;Not yet anyway. &nbsp;</p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;">The new and improved Google Maps Navigation on the other hand, that includes juicy features like Street View navigation and voice control. &nbsp;And you'll never have to update a map again. &nbsp;&nbsp;</p><p class="MsoNormal"><br /></p><p></p> 

<div style="text-align: center;"><object height="295" width="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/tGXK4jKN_jY&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/tGXK4jKN_jY&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="295" width="480"><a class="cypizhmjrkqtzdfphpzc" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/tGXK4jKN_jY&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;"></a><a class="cypizhmjrkqtzdfphpzc" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/tGXK4jKN_jY&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;"></a></object><div><p></p>
</div>

<p></p></div><p></p>
]]>
        

    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Doom Everywhere...</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/2009/11/doom-everywhere.html" />
    <id>tag:www.computerweekly.com,2009:/blogs/inspect-a-gadget//208.76291</id>

    <published>2009-11-12T16:28:21Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-12T16:45:00Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[16 years ago, when I first downloaded the demo for 3D fragfest Doom to my Fujitsu 386 DX PC, I thought it was the canine's orbs.&nbsp; This week I've been playing it in my web browser at newsgrounds.com, on an...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Karl Hodge</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Games" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/">
        <![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: left;"><o:p>16 years ago, when I first downloaded the demo for 3D fragfest Doom to my
Fujitsu 386 DX PC, I thought it was the canine's orbs.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>This week I've been playing it in my web
browser at <a href="http://www.newgrounds.com/portal/view/470460">newsgrounds.com</a>, on an Android powered HTC Hero (<a href="http://shop.orange.co.uk/mobile-phones/htc-hero-in-graphite">on loan from </a><st1:city w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on"><a href="http://shop.orange.co.uk/mobile-phones/htc-hero-in-graphite">Orange</a></st1:place></st1:city>), on an <a href="http://www.idsoftware.com/doom-classic/">iPhone</a> and <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/doomlegacy/">on a Mac</a>.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>Doom is the first
person shooter that simply refuses to die.</o:p></p>

<p class="MsoNormal">And while I'm here getting all misty eyed about blasting
cacodaemons, it's worth noting that the latest incarnation isn't the lovely
looking but ludicrously unforgiving Doom 3 - but Doom Resurrection; a version
of the revamped 3D shooter for the iPhone.</p><p class="MsoNormal"><br /></p>

<p align="center"><object width="320" height="265" align="center"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/IF9BPIKApxk&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IF9BPIKApxk&amp;hl=en_GB&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="320" height="265"></object></p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><br /></p><p class="MsoNormal">Sing along with me! "Ner ner, ner ner ner, ner ner ner, ner
ner ner ner ner ner ner!"<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Hmm.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Perhaps the original Doom theme doesn't
translate all that well to text... </p>

<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p><p></p> 
]]>
        

    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Review: Spotify for Android</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/2009/11/review-spotify-for-android.html" />
    <id>tag:www.computerweekly.com,2009:/blogs/inspect-a-gadget//208.75913</id>

    <published>2009-11-11T12:19:36Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-11T12:49:53Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[Spotify for Android. Please note: these are not my playlists... Robbie Williams. Bleurgh.I love Spotify.&nbsp; No one has paid me to say this.&nbsp; Well, technically, someone has.&nbsp; Someone will pay me for this entry - but I am free to...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Karl Hodge</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Mobile" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Music" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/">
        <![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal"><img alt="Thumbnail image for spotify-android-playlist2-large.jpg" src="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/assets_c/2009/11/spotify-android-playlist2-large-thumb-400x665-53234.jpg" width="400" height="665" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></p><p class="MsoNormal" style="text-align: center;"><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 0.8em; "><font class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 1.25em; ">Spotify for Android. Please note: these are not my playlists... Robbie Williams. Bleurgh.</font></font></font></p><p class="MsoNormal"><br /></p><p class="MsoNormal">I love Spotify.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>No
one has paid me to say this.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Well,
technically, someone has.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Someone will
pay me for this entry - but I am free to say "Spotify is as rancid as an old
plum that's been stored for ten years in a tramp's boot" if I want.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>But I don't want, because I love Spotify.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">The famous streaming music app has completely changed the
way I access and listen to music. And I do listen to music a lot.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>From Vivaldi to Vampire Weekend and every
stop in between.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Except Keane.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>No one likes Keane.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">While my collection has been partially digital since I
picked up my first iPod from <st1:state w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">New York</st1:place></st1:state>'s
Apple shop in 2003, there have still been CDs.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp;
</span>Not anymore though. Spotify just made them redundant.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">Of course, there are some notable artists you won't find on
Spotify yet. There's no Pink Floyd or Peter Gabriel. There's little Husker Du.
The problem isn't that those artists haven't agreed to appear - it's that deals
have yet to be brokered with their labels.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">But there's still plenty to love about Spotify.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>An easy to use interface that isn't a slave
to iTunes, support for Boolean searching, shared and collaborative playlists
and streaming music that's of perfectly listenable 160Kbps quality.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp;</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal">And, loving Spotify as I did, I thought the company had shot
itself in the foot.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Its revenue model is
based on two prongs.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>The first;
advertising interrupts your listening pleasure if you use the free version.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>And, we have to admit, the advertising can be
pretty annoying.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Especially when your
carefully composed playlist of 70s German electro is interrupted by Robbie
Williams honking out his new single. The second; <a href="http://www.spotify.com/en/products/premium/">you can trade up to Premium</a>
for £9.99 a month - or £119.88 a year.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp;</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal">A tenner a month sounds a bit steep - but if you're a real
music fan, it's equivalent to a CD every 30 days or 10 tracks a month on iTunes.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Still, I was wondering - what true incentive is
there to go Premium when Spotify's already giving you so much for free?<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>And then I tried Spotify for Android.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp;</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal">Now I get it.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">Spotify's mobile applications - <a href="http://www.spotify.com/en/mobile/overview/">Spotify for Android and
Spotify for iPhone</a> are beautifully designed music player apps in a mobile world
overpopulated with appalling, thrown together twitch and flick interfaces.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Realising that screen real estate is at a
premium, Spotify for Android packs all its functionality into four simple tabs
in understated Spotify charcoal and green; Playlists, Search, Playback and
Home.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>The search page is actually better
than in the desktop version of the app - enabling you to choose between title,
artist or album with the click of a tab. And instead of flipping through a
stack of bitmap thumbnails to find music, it's all available in easy to
navigate lists.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Goodbye, pretty but
user-unfriendly cover-flow. Goodbye forever.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">The mobile app is free to download - but there's an apparent
catch.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>You need to be a Spotify Premium
user.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>After a few days carrying Spotify
for Android around on an HTC Hero though, we're failing to see the
problem.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>With unlimited data - bundled with
many mobile contract packages these days - Spotify turns your handset into a
digital music player with almost limitless capacity.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>And, if 3G bandwidth is a problem, it's easy to
download playlists for offline listening.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp;
</span>You just click "Offline Playlists" and tick which ones you want to back
up when you've got a WiFi connection. You can store up to 3333 tracks, which is, more than enough for a couple of
week's holiday off grid.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">I've read other reviews of the mobile versions of Spotify
and there's one thing they don't make clear enough.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Spotify for Android doesn't cost £9.99 a
month as some insinuate - it's free with Spotify Premium.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>You get Spotify Premium on your desktop and on
your mobile for the same price.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>That
means no more adverts, 320kbps resolution, and offline listening on both your mobile
phone and desktop computers.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Who needs
to actually buy music anymore? If you're Spotify savvy - not you.</p> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>O2 Fire first Shot in iPhone Price War</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/2009/11/o2-fire-first-shot-in-iphone-price-war.html" />
    <id>tag:www.computerweekly.com,2009:/blogs/inspect-a-gadget//208.75423</id>

    <published>2009-11-09T19:10:03Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-10T10:06:21Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[In a move that appears to be designed to upset Orange's apple cart, O2 have just announced that users of their iPhone Internet Tethering bolt-on&nbsp;&nbsp;who sign up on or&nbsp;before 31 December 2009 will be entitled to the standard Home Broadband...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Karl Hodge</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Apple" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Mobile" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/">
        <![CDATA[<p>In a move that appears to be designed to upset Orange's apple cart, <a href="http://shop.o2.co.uk/update/iphone.html">O2 have just announced that users of their iPhone Internet Tethering bolt-on&nbsp;</a>&nbsp;who sign up on or&nbsp;before 31 December 2009 will be entitled to the standard Home Broadband package for free. Tethering - which enables you to use your iPhone as a 3G modem when you're out and about - costs £9.79 a month with a 3GB allowance. Now you can get online for free at home as well.</p><div>The "Total Connectivity" offer applies to new or existing customers - who can also choose to have heavily discounted Home Broadband Premium or Pro access instead. &nbsp;The standard broadband package includes up to 8Mbps speeds and "unlimited" usage. &nbsp;Premium users get an up to 20Mbps home broadband connection for £2.45 a month when they buy the iPhone Tethering bolt-on as well for £9.79.<div><br /></div><div>That iPhone price war might be kicking off after all...</div><div><br /></div><div><b><span class="Apple-style-span" style="text-decoration: underline;">UPDATE - 10th November:</span></b></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="text-decoration: underline;"><b><br /></b></span></div><div>Orange begin selling the iPhone today, and O2 respond by starting a scheme to unlock Pay Monthly phones that are out of contract for free... a fee of £15 will be charged to PAYG iPhone customers. More details at O2's "<a href="http://shop.o2.co.uk/update/unlockmyiphone.html">Unlock Your iPhone</a>" microsite.<span class="Apple-style-span" style="text-decoration: underline;"></span></div><div><br /></div><div><br /></div></div><p></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>This Green and Mobile Land</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/2009/11/this-green-and-mobile-land.html" />
    <id>tag:www.computerweekly.com,2009:/blogs/inspect-a-gadget//208.75362</id>

    <published>2009-11-09T11:35:07Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-09T13:22:36Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[I've been looking into some green options for charging my mobile. &nbsp;Not just because I'm keen on the ice caps not melting and flooding Norfolk either. &nbsp;When you're on the move in business, as I am half of the week,...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Karl Hodge</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Green" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Mobile" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/">
        <![CDATA[I've been looking into some green options for charging my mobile. &nbsp;Not just because I'm keen on the ice caps not melting and flooding Norfolk either. &nbsp;When you're on the move in business, as I am half of the week, it seems like a good idea to have something in your laptop bag you can charge your <span class="Apple-style-span" style="text-decoration: line-through;">lifeline</span>&nbsp;phone with.<div><br /></div><div>I have an HTC Touch Diamond, that I habitually charge using a USB cable plugged into whatever laptop I'm toting around (sometimes it's a Fujitsu Siemens PC, sometimes it's a MacBook Pro. I also use an old 12" Apple Powerbook like a netbook - because I'm <i>that</i> retro).</div><div><br /></div><div>But what if there are no powerpoints on the train? Or what if you don't have a laptop with you? Or what if the sky starts falling in, Chicken Little? &nbsp;In my online travels this week I discovered a couple of options I might be using in the future. &nbsp;First up is the nPower Personal Energy Generator. Alas, we don't think it has anything to do with nPower in the UK - this company's based in Cleveland, Ohio and will run into trouble if they ever start marketing their green products here... A pity, because the PEG looks brilliant: a small gadget that charges your mobile using kinetic energy. Yes, <i>kinetic</i> energy. &nbsp;You plug it into your phone and it juices it up as you walk, or run or jump up and down. &nbsp;A one hour walk should charge most mobiles to 80%. Priced at $148, it's available for pre-order at&nbsp;<a href="http://www.greennpower.com">greennpower.com</a> - though no info as yet about whether they ship to the UK.</div><div><br /></div><div>A cheaper option is a cute little doohickey called the <a href="http://www.yogenstore.com/">YoGen mobile charger</a> - available in generic miniUSB flavours and for microUSB. At $39.99 - it's available now and charges your phone using an innovative string pull system. It's a bit like the cord you had to tug to get your talking Action Man to say "This is your commander speaking". Or, if you were me, your mate's talking Action Man... &nbsp;A couple of minutes string pulling gets you enough power to make an emergency call. Keep going for an hour and you'll have a fully charged phone...</div><div><br /></div><div><a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/yogen.jpg"><br /><img alt="yogen.jpg" src="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/assets_c/2009/11/yogen-thumb-400x180-53027.jpg" width="400" height="180" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></div><div>Of course - if you want to buy British, <a href="http://www.trevorbaylisbrands.com/">Trevor Baylis</a> is the man for green power products. The inventor of the wind-up radio also manufactures an Eco-Pro Torch and Mobile Phone Charger. It's a torch! It's a mobile phone charger! It takes ages to wind! And it's about £23.99 <a href="http://www.google.co.uk/products?q=trevor+balis+eco-pro+torch+and+mobile+phone+charger&amp;hl=en">from online stores</a>.</div>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Left 4 Dead 2 - Demo Available Now!</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/2009/11/left-4-dead-2---demo-available-now.html" />
    <id>tag:www.computerweekly.com,2009:/blogs/inspect-a-gadget//208.75248</id>

    <published>2009-11-06T17:26:47Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-07T13:17:10Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[While downloading Machinarium from Steam yesterday I noticed that the long awaited&nbsp;Left 4 Dead 2 demo was available. Had, in fact, been available for public download since the 4th&nbsp;of November. Just in case you have no idea what I'm talking...]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Karl Hodge</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Games" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/">
        <![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">While downloading <a href="http://www.machinarium.net">Machinarium</a> from <a href="http://www.steampowered.com/">Steam</a> yesterday I noticed
that the long awaited&nbsp;<a href="http://www.l4d.com">Left 4 Dead 2</a> demo was available. Had, in fact, been available for public download since the 4th&nbsp;of November. Just in case you have no idea what I'm talking about, Left 4 Dead is the latest first person shooter that all the craziest kids are playing; a survival horror game you can play alone or co-operatively online.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">I made a mental note to grab it for three
reasons:</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">* I love Valve.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>Half
Life is my favourite game of all time.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp;
</span>Apart from Portal, which actually is my favourite game of all time.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp;And Half Life 2, which really is my favourite game of all time.</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal">* Half Life 2: Episode 3 has been in development hell for
approximately ten million years.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp;
</span>Actually, 25 months.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>But it feels
like ten million years - and I was jonesing bad for some first person shooting action.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">* No one shuts up about Left 4 Dead on Twitter.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>It's all "L4D is ground breaking this" and "mould
busting that".<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>And, listening to all
that praise? Empathising with all that rampant, &nbsp;second hand fun? That was difficult, because
there was no way to try Left 4 Dead except to buy it.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>A demo was made available briefly on Steam, but
withdrawn within days. In my experience forking out £25 for a game without
playing a demo is a bit like meeting up with someone you found on <a href="http://www.match.com">match.com</a> named
Helga, without seeing a photo first. Unwise.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">500MB of download later I'm getting ready to have me some
lovely first person shooty bang bang action, in the dark, with my speakers turned
up.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>A nicely rendered cinematic at the beginning
gives you an idea what to expect.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp;&nbsp;Four o</span>rdinary folk who are trapped in a zombie infested city miss out on being
rescued because&nbsp;<i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal">blah, blah, blah, hurry up and
let me start killing things.</i></p>

<p class="MsoNormal">My wish was soon Valve's command, as I chose to play a
single player campaign as some dude called Cleetus or Doofus or it doesn't
really matter because within seconds, <i style="mso-bidi-font-style:normal">oh
my giddy Aunt</i>, there were swarms of very fast moving zombies leaping and
running towards me and all I had to protect myself and my friends was a
sub-machine gun which needed reloading every 30 seconds and, of course, the
ability to shove individual zombies in the swarm (arms flailing, viscera splashing everywhere) back two
inches by feebly right clicking on them.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp;</span></p>

<p class="MsoNormal">HA HA HA! Ha ha! Ha.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">Left 4 Dead 2 gave me the screaming ab dabs in a way that no
game has managed since... oooh ...the original Quake back in 1996. It's the
combination of desolation and expectation and mundanity, followed by a sudden, unbidden
onslaught of horrific and dizzying violence. Again and again and again. You
pick off some lone shuffling zombies, you are attacked by a horde of them,
everything goes quiet, you move around a bit. <span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp;</span>If you're lucky enough to have a health pack,
you heal. Rinse and repeat.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>There's
little sense of progress. <span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp;</span>There's little
sense at all.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>But it's utterly and
terrifyingly thrilling.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">Still, after an hour's relentless, bloody assault, I couldn't
wait to return back to the tranquil and comforting whimsy of Machinarium again.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>And now, the bad dreams just won't stop...</p><p class="MsoNormal"><br /></p><p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/assets_c/2009/11/l4d02-52915.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/assets_c/2009/11/l4d02-52915.html','popup','width=800,height=500,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/assets_c/2009/11/l4d02-thumb-400x250-52915.jpg" width="400" height="250" alt="l4d02.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></p> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Machinarium</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/2009/11/machinarium.html" />
    <id>tag:www.computerweekly.com,2009:/blogs/inspect-a-gadget//208.75092</id>

    <published>2009-11-05T17:34:04Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-05T18:06:30Z</updated>

    <summary>My esteemed colleague Faisal Alani set a dangerous precedent when he wrote about Pro Evolution Soccer 2010. Yes, we can write about games here, it said, under the radar - on the QT and the hush, hush... Which is just...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Karl Hodge</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Games" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/">
        <![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">My esteemed colleague Faisal Alani set a dangerous precedent when he
wrote about <a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/2009/10/video-pro-evolution-soccer-pes-2010-review---back-to-its-best.html">Pro Evolution Soccer 2010</a>. Yes, we can write
about games here, it said, under the radar - on the QT and the hush, hush... Which is just as well, because I just lost an <i>entire afternoon</i> of my life playing the gorgeous <a href="http://www.machinarium.net/">Machinarium</a> - a new(ish) adventure
for PC and Mac from Amanita Design.&nbsp;</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">You're a Wall-E style robot venturing through a deliciously hand-scribbled steampunk environment. With a new point and click puzzle to solve on
every level, ambient, tinkling music follows you through the cluttered cityscape.&nbsp;Your course is blocked at every opportunity and you have to work out how best to the use the objects lying around to help you get past each obstacle.&nbsp;With so much detail etched into every scene, there's never any rush to move on though.</p><p class="MsoNormal">It's tranquil, fun and cute with a capital C.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>At least, it is when things are going
swimmingly... Like all the best puzzles, there are moments when lateral thinking
simply isn't good enough - and only wandering around clicking frantically on everything within clicking distance will help. There <i>are</i> hints on every level too, but real gamers don't do walkthroughs, do they?<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp;&nbsp;</span>Ahem.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">The first three levels can be played for free, online at <a href="http://www.machinarium.net/">www.machinarium.net</a> on any platform that
runs Flash - and you can download the full PC version for £14.99 through Steam.</p><p class="MsoNormal"><br /></p><p class="MsoNormal"><a href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/assets_c/2009/11/machinarium-52556.html" onclick="window.open('http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/assets_c/2009/11/machinarium-52556.html','popup','width=1280,height=1024,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/assets_c/2009/11/machinarium-thumb-400x320-52556.jpg" width="400" height="320" alt="machinarium.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></p> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Video: The Cookie Monster created Google! Well, he sang about it 27 yrs ago</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/2009/11/video-the-cookie-monster-created-google-well-he-sang-about-it-27-yrs-ago.html" />
    <id>tag:www.computerweekly.com,2009:/blogs/inspect-a-gadget//208.75065</id>

    <published>2009-11-05T14:25:22Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-05T15:45:57Z</updated>

    <summary>We all love the Cookie Monster and of course we also love Google so whenI heard that there was a video of the Cookie Monster singing about Google I thought I&apos;d died and gone to heaven.</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Faisal Alani</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Google" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
        <category term="Video" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="google" label="google" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/">
        <![CDATA[We all love the Cookie Monster and of course we also love Google so whenI heard that there was a video of the Cookie Monster singing about Google I thought I'd died and gone to heaven.<br /><br />What's amazing is the fact that this track was recorded TWENTY SEVEN YEARS AGO, sixtten years before Google was created. Coincidence? I don't think so.<br /><br /><div align="center"><object height="385" width="480"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/SdRkdvKy5WI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/SdRkdvKy5WI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" height="385" width="480"><a class="yszixkfsdgtoaxwzlcoz" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/SdRkdvKy5WI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;"></a><a class="yszixkfsdgtoaxwzlcoz" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/SdRkdvKy5WI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;"></a><a class="yszixkfsdgtoaxwzlcoz" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/SdRkdvKy5WI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;"></a><a class="yszixkfsdgtoaxwzlcoz" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/SdRkdvKy5WI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;"></a><a style="left: 481px ! important; top: 107px ! important;" title="Block this object with Adblock Plus" class="yszixkfsdgtoaxwzlcoz huzcrtkdvpiyjnvyvheg" href="http://www.youtube.com/v/SdRkdvKy5WI&amp;hl=en&amp;fs=1&amp;"></a></object><br /></div><br />It will surprise you to know that the Cookie Monster is... <b>the creator of Google</b>. I know it sounds bizarre but think about it. It all makes sense now, the crazy colours, Google Wave (he's always waving) and the fact they named one of their products 'caffeine' which is in coffee which goes well with, yep you guessed it, cookies.<br /><br /><div align="center"><img alt="cookie monster google.jpg" src="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/cookie%20monster%20google.jpg" class="mt-image-center" style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;" height="212" width="500" /></div><br />Google celebrated the 40th anniversary of Sesame Street with another one of their trademark homepages and, I think, to pay homeage to their leader.<br /><br />It sounds so crazy it's believable. Of course it could be that he's singing about googly eyes but I'm not having that.<br /><br />So, clear your cache before you switch your computer off. In fact you can clear your cookies as well... oh.<br /> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>200 Quid for an Apple: The Beatles go Digital</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/2009/11/200-quid-for-an-apple-the-beatles-go-digital.html" />
    <id>tag:www.computerweekly.com,2009:/blogs/inspect-a-gadget//208.74873</id>

    <published>2009-11-04T11:58:24Z</published>
    <updated>2009-11-04T12:23:47Z</updated>

    <summary>The back catalogue of Liverpool&apos;s greatest musical export - and, no, we don&apos;t mean The Teardrop Explodes - are finally going to be available in glorious digital stereo. But, you won&apos;t be able to download them. Not just yet. I&apos;m...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Karl Hodge</name>
        
    </author>
    
        <category term="Audio" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/">
        <![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal">The back catalogue of <st1:place w:st="on">Liverpool</st1:place>'s
greatest musical export - and, no, we don't mean The Teardrop Explodes - are finally
going to be available in glorious digital stereo. But, you won't be able to
download them. Not just yet.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">I'm writing about it here because, following the model of EMI's
digital <span class="Apple-style-span" style="text-decoration: line-through;">exploitation</span> presentation of <a href="http://www.radioheadstore.com/stick.asp">Radiohead's
first 7 albums</a>, the digital versions of The Beatle's official long players will first
be released on a USB stick. A USB stick embedded in a plastic apple.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">The 16GB flash drive will feature all 14 official fab four
platters, from 1962's "Please Please Me" to "Past Masters" - a double set that
collects Beatle songs not featured on other albums.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>From details released at <a href="http://www.beatles.com/">www.beatles.com</a>, it seems like the digital
release, limited to 30,000 copies, will feature all the extras bundled with the
recently issued <a href="http://www.digitalstores.co.uk/beatles/productdetail.jsp?MaxHits=12&amp;Category=remasters&amp;productPK=unittest-7aMihAZDD5X7UsnjqN3IEb-1">remastered stereo box set </a>- including mini-documentaries and
album artwork. The tunes will be presented in lossless 44.1 khz, 24 bit
FLAC and 320 Kbps MP3 formats.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">While these high quality Beatle releases are very welcome, I can't help
feeling that the famous fab quality control machine has developed a bit of a glitch.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>You could argue that the package - an "exquisitely crafted" sculptural replica of Apple Corp's famous Granny Smith logo - will be an
interesting <i>objet d'art</i>; a talking point in years to come.<span style="mso-spacerun:yes">&nbsp; </span>For me, it's just 200 quid's worth of injection moulded Apple; another sign that record companies have yet to find a format as
conducive to beautiful design as the 12" record sleeve. I think I'd prefer to stump up for the remastered CDs and rip 'em into iTunes myself.</p>

<p class="MsoNormal">The package will be released on December 7<sup>th</sup> in
the <st1:country-region w:st="on">UK</st1:country-region> and, rather
ghoulishly, December 8<sup>th</sup> in the <st1:country-region w:st="on"><st1:place w:st="on">USA</st1:place></st1:country-region>; the 29<sup>th</sup> anniversary
of John Lennon's death.</p><p class="MsoNormal"><br /></p><p class="MsoNormal"><img alt="apple01.png" src="http://www.computerweekly.com/blogs/inspect-a-gadget/apple01.png" width="278" height="209" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></p> ]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
