iSCSI SANs, hardware-based tape encryption, high-capacity disk
drives, virtualization and thin provisioning will be must-have
technologies next year.If the storage industry is anything, it's dynamic. But some
things never change: the need for more storage capacity and the
endless search for better, less tedious ways to protect data.
Storage magazine's editors have reviewed technology
developments, product introductions and storage standards (see
"Storage standards to watch in 2007") over this past year to
identify those we expect will become the hot storage technologies
in 2007. Some of these technologies, like iSCSI SANs and
virtualization, have appeared in these pages for years. This coming
year, however, both appear poised to cross a major threshold. Other
selections, like hardware-based tape encryption, are based on new
technologies that attempt to address a single issue: stemming the
tide of identify theft and misappropriation of corporate secrets
resulting from lost data tapes.
Storage standards to watch in 2007

Thin provisioning, long championed by a single storage system
vendor, 3PAR, has gained the attention of many more vendors and is
showing up in more products. We expect thin provisioning to become
an essential disk-array feature because it saves money by avoiding
the need to overbuy storage. Disk-drive technology continues to
defy predictions of how much data can be packed onto a disk. The
storage industry will introduce 1TB disk drives in 2007 and even
greater capacity drives will follow soon after. Other new
technologies--data deduplication, continuous data protection (CDP),
data classification and information lifecycle management
(ILM)--look promising, but need more time to mature and gain
acceptance (see "Not hot in 2007")
Not hot in 2007

iSCSI SANs
Midsized organizations were early adopters of iSCSI because of its
low cost and easy implementation. Previously, 1Gb/sec was about as
fast as IP networks ran, but that didn't matter. "Performance
wasn't a concern. The big benefit was cost," says Steve Meckling,
network services administrator at Shiloh Industries Inc., a
manufacturer of auto-industry components in Valley City, OH.
iSCSI has been steadily gaining momentum. According to a recent
report from Framingham, MA-based research firm IDC, the iSCSI
protocol is expected to capture more than 10% of storage systems
revenue and an even greater percentage of capacity by 2008. In the
early days of storage networking, large enterprises viewed iSCSI
SANs as "training wheels" that would someday grow into a Fibre
Channel (FC) SAN for industrial-strength performance. FC has
steadily progressed from 2Gb/sec to 4Gb/sec. But IP/Ethernet
recently leapfrogged FC in the performance race with 10Gb/sec
Ethernet over copper. At 10Gb/sec, iSCSI offers a faster pipe than
FC, and will continue to hold that edge even when FC gets to
8Gb/sec in a couple of years.
However, iSCSI was never just about performance. "The elevator
pitch for an iSCSI SAN is that it saves money by using Ethernet;
but what users really like are the features they get automatically
with iSCSI SANs--load balancing, snapshots and more," says Stephen
Foskett, director of strategy services at GlassHouse Technologies
Inc., Framingham, MA. "iSCSI SAN is definitely happening."
For the enterprise, the issue now is coexistence. "Places with
FC SANs are installing iSCSI SANs, too. They want alternatives.
iSCSI won't replace FC; rather, it lets large companies make
storage decisions based on business needs," says Mike Karp, senior
analyst, Enterprise Management Associates, Boulder, CO. "Almost
every storage product vendor is supporting iSCSI these days," he
adds. Even enterprise storage vendors like EMC Corp. and IBM Corp.
have embraced iSCSI.
In terms of cost, iSCSI SANs still have the edge over FC. For
example, Shiloh Industries currently operates 17TB of storage using
four EqualLogic Inc. iSCSI SANs, which cost approximately $40,000
each.
Hardware-based tape encryption
The reasons to encrypt data became obvious this year: a succession
of incidents in which backup tapes disappeared; federal directives
mandating government agencies encrypt stored data; and 34 states
currently requiring companies to inform anyone whose identity might
have been compromised by lost data.
There are a number of ways to encrypt stored data--at the host,
through a network-based appliance, within the storage device or
tape library--but the tape device promises the fastest performance
with the least impact. We may be going out on a limb with this
prediction, but we expect hardware-based tape encryption to become
the preferred choice of the largest enterprises with
mainframe-based data centers.
These data centers back up sensitive data for hundreds of
thousands, if not millions, of customers. They need reliable
performance and transparent operations. "These are the companies
that manage data on tape for the long term," says Robert Amatruda,
IDC's research director, tape and removable storage.
For the rest of the IT world, hardware-based tape encryption
will appear in the next generation of LTO devices, LTO-4, probably
beginning sometime in 2007. The LTO-4 products will probably
involve little or no price premium over today's nonencrypting LTO
drives, notes Robert Abraham, president and senior analyst, Freeman
Reports, Ojai, CA.
For big data centers, IBM and Sun Microsystems Inc./StorageTek
introduced encryption built into their tape drives. IBM introduced
data encryption on System Storage TS1120 tape drives. These drives
encrypt data at tape speed, avoiding the need for host-based
encryption that eats host CPU cycles. Sun offers the StorageTek
Crypto-Ready T10000 tape drive, which supports a variety of
operating systems, including z/OS, Solaris and Windows.
The enterprise products don't come cheap. The Sun product costs
$37,000, plus a $5,000 charge to turn on the encryption feature.
The IBM product is $35,000. Encryption appliances like those from
Decru Inc. (now owned by Network Appliance Inc.), NeoScale Systems
Inc. and Vormetric Inc., as well as upcoming LTO-4 drives will be
less expensive than tape-encryption drives from IBM and Sun;
however, IBM's and Sun's products appeal to enterprises that run
large mainframe data centers. "These data centers want an
end-to-end storage solution," says Amatruda. "They want native tape
drives and don't want the uncertainty of dealing with little
companies."
While the enterprise products aren't for every organization,
once LTO-4-based tape encryption becomes available, expect
tape-drive encryption to become more of a commodity with
appropriate pricing.
Click here for
Hot storage technologies page 2