Businesses are risking the return on investment from their
enterprise software because the levels of end user skills are in
decline, according to the Meta Group.A survey of Meta clients using JD Edwards ERP
software revealed 45% of respondents expressing concern at "user
competency".
According to a Meta research note, "Parallel
studies into SAP's installed base have revealed a similar decay in
ERP end-user competency."
Meta analyst Andreas Bitterer said, "This is
not a platform issue. It is true across the board for ERP and CRM
systems."
Many firms provide end-user training for
enterprise software only once, when the system is installed. After
that they rely on internal "pass the baton" training.
"This condemns the user base to declining
skills and knowledge and that has a direct impact on the return on
investment," he added.
David Roberts, chief executive officer at
Corporate IT Forum Tif, said the need to maintain skill levels
"should be blindingly obvious".
Ongoing training was simply "the cost of
living with IT".
"It should be the HR function that recognises
the problem, but the board may need extra encouragement from the IT
director. IT investment is not cheap," he added.
Simon England, government partner at
consultants Accenture, said he was constantly surprised by the way
organisations underestimate the "people costs" in implementing and
maintaining enterprise software.
"As a rule of thumb, some 40% to 50% of your
budget should go on people change aspects of a technology led
change programme," said England.
"Too often we see people trying to spend 10%
or less," he added.
The Accenture partner said, "If you invest
hundreds of millions of pounds you build a tight business case and
track return on investment, but very few organisations track return
on investment for training."
BT is one of the few organisations that does,
said England. The telco has a successful contract with Accenture
where the consultancy is paid by the measurable business benefit of
the training it provides to BT sales and customer service
staff.
According to Victoria Gill, an adviser on
training at the Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development,
UK training budgets in the private sector were down 27.9% in the
past 12 months.
The figures, from a CIPD survey, compare
favourably with the reduction in training budgets in the economic
downturns in the 1980s and 1990s, she said.
However, analysis of the CIPD figures by Ewart
Keep, deputy director of the Warwick University centre for Skills,
Knowledge and Organisational Performance, suggested that the
headline figure on training budgets was disguising deeper
problems.
"There are indications that the bulk of
employer-provided training is underpinned by operational or
legislative requirements that make cuts difficult, if not
impossible, to contemplate.
"Buoyant figures on training spend may reflect
costs that are more or less unavoidable rather than some deeper
organisational commitment to skills development," said Keep.
Like England, Meta's Bitterer was adamant that
organisations should resist the pressure to cut high-end
training.
"Companies buy enterprise packages to get
competitive advantage, but if your employees are effectively doing
data entry and you never leverage the analytics and other advanced
applications of the package, you are simply hurting yourself and
your business," he warned.